SING A ONE-ON-ONE LISTING PROCESS
To Select and Prioritize Community Problems and Visions
- I. Community Organizing as a Three Step Process
- Listen to People’s Concerns and Visions for Their Neighborhood
- Research Potential Solutions
- Action: Meet with Public Officials
- II. Steps in a One-On-One Listening Process
- Identify Members of a Listening Team (people who are relational and good listeners)
- One-On-One Training
- Training and Practice
- Deciding “Who Will Visit Who” and Further Planning
- One-On-One Visits (6-8 Weeks)
- Visits Begin
- Mid-Process Meeting (After 3-4 Weeks) – Evaluation and Accountability
- Visits Completed
- Listening Team Meeting
- Report and Record Community Problems and Visions
- Prepare for Larger “Membership” Meeting
- Prepare List of Community Problems and Visions
- Plan Agenda and Turnout
- Evaluate Listening Process
- “Membership” Meeting [See Attached “Potential Agenda”]
- Listening Team Reports Number of Visits and Presents Lists of Community Problems and Visions
- Membership Discusses and Votes on Priorities
- Membership Invited to Join Research and Action Committees
- Research and Action Committees Begin Research
- III. Things to Remember
- Each Visitor (Listening Team Member) Visits 10 Persons
- Each Visitor Needs 15-20 Names In Order to Do 10 Visits
- Prioritize Only the Number of Community Problems and Visions That the Organization Can Realistically Solve (2 to 4)
- The Listening Process Has Created a Mobilization Network for Future Action
PRINCIPALS OF AND PREPARATION FOR NEGOTIATING
Guiding Principals of Negotiating
- Our Goal is Not to Be Liked, But to Be Respected
- We Want to Work with the Target, But Also Need to Hold Them Accountable
- We Seek a Win-Win Result (i.e. We want our self-interests met, but also will consider the target’s self-interests)
PREPARATION FOR NEGOTIATING
- Important Questions
- Are we clear and specific about what we want and when?
- Which of our requests/demands are essential and non-negotiable? Which of our requests/demands can we live without?
- Are we meeting with the right person? Does he or she have the power to give us what we want?
- What do we know about the target?
- Style
- Who is she or he accountable and connected to?
- What is this person’s history on our concerns?
- What are his or her self-interests? Are we able to help the target achieve them?
- How much time will we have or do we need with the target?
- Where should the meeting occur?
- Role Play the Negotiation Meeting
- Room Arrangement and Seating
- Explaining
- Who We Are
- Why We Are Here
- The Community Problem and Proposed Solution
- What We Want the Target to Do
- Anticipating the Target’s Response
- What do we think the target will say?
- If the target says “this”, we will say “that”.
- What Will We Do If the Target Says “No”?
- Setting the Date, Time, and Location
- The Negotiating Team Meets At-Least One Hour Before the Negotiating Meeting to Review Their Goals and Plan
Conducting the Negotiation
- No More Than 2 Key Spokespeople
- Have Persons Directly Effected by the Problem Ready to Give Passionate Stories
- Be Prepared to Caucus (i.e. If the target says something you were not anticipating, the spokespeople can announce that the negotiating team would like a few minutes alone to discuss among themselves.)
Evaluating the Negotiation
- Do an Evaluation Immediately Afterward
- How Does Everyone Feel About the Negotiating Meeting?
- What Went Well? What Could We Have Done Differently?
- Did We Get What We Wanted?
- Initial Thoughts About Next Steps
COMMUNITY ISSUES SELECTION, RESEARCH AND ACTION
I. Criteria in Selection Community Justice Issues
A. Specific
- What do we want and when?
- Who is the target (i.e. person/institution that can give us what we want)?
B. Winnable and Immediate
- Is the target local?
- Do we have enough people/power to win?
C. Will It Build the Organization
- Will it train our leaders, attract allies, build relationships?
- Is the issue popular within the organization?
II. Three Key Areas of Research
A. Researching the Issue
- Who can give personal stories and effects concerning the issue?
- How many does the issue effect?
- What is needed? Costs? Models from elsewhere or locally?
- History and background?
B. Researching the Target
- Who decides and has the power to give us what we want?
- Who are they accountable to?
- History of the target on the issue?
C. Researching Potential Allies
- Who are potential “willing” allies (i.e. those who agree with the issue)?
- Who are potential “unwilling” allies (i.e. those who have a relationship with the target?)
III. Aspects of a Public Meeting/Action
- Specific Demands: What we want and when.
- Clear and Distinct Target: Person, not an institution, that can give us what we want.
- Face-To-Face: Not by letter, through the media, etc.
- Public: Not behind closed doors.
- Action Is In the Reaction: Getting the target to negotiate and take you seriously.
Loading...